Day: June 5, 2013

Ituri: DRC’s forgotten conflict zone

Matthias Witt, who studied post-conflict reconstruction and humanitarian response at Georgetown University, currently works in public health and emergency programming for an international NGO in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)’s Ituri district.  He reports:

The DRC has been covered in the news extensively since fighting flared up again in November 2012, when the M23 rebel movement took over Goma.  This was yet another reminder of the international community’s  failed efforts to stabilize the region and keep the “peace.”

The events were not without consequences; they led to the Kampala peace negotiations between a variety of armed groups and the Congolese government, and they catalyzed an African Union summit paper aimed, as so often before, at supporting regional stability. It also led to the creation of yet another UN post – the Special Envoy of the Secretary General to the Great Lakes,  a role now occupied by Ireland’s Mary Robinson – and the extension of the mandate of the UN Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO).  The Security Council added some extra firepower in the form of a “Special Intervention Brigade” authorized to seek out and eliminate armed rebel movements in the country’s troubled East. The almost comical international legalese of this particular resolution aside – the mandate of the Special Brigade is apparently “unprecedented, yet without setting a precedent” – the dynamics coming out of this decision could make for some dramatic developments in the region, for better or worse. Read more

Tags :

Comfortably numb

While Tzipi Livni was lifting spirits at the American Jewish Committee, the New America Foundation hosted Israeli journalists Linoy Bar-Geffen and Uri Misgav this week to discuss how Israeli media ignore the occupation of Palestine.  Both are hoping to change this attitude and increase dialogue on Palestinian issues in the Middle East and in Washington.

Uri Misgav of Haaretz explained that coverage of the conflict and the occupation of Palestine has diminished significantly in the past decade. Positive coverage of relations between Israelis and Palestinians peaked during the period of the Oslo Accords of 1993. Young Israelis actively tried to meet and learn from Palestinians.  The media attempted humanized stories about the conflict. Coverage wasn’t balanced, but at least it was widespread.

The current lull in violence between Israel and Palestine has failed to resuscitate positive stories and instead has halted all  media coverage. News stories about Palestine don’t sell. The Israeli public does not welcome and is not interested. Sarah Wildman, foreign policy correspondent with PoliticsDaily.com noted that, just like in America, reports of suicide bombing and extremists sell papers, but more nuanced coverage of human interest stories does not. Read more

Tags :

Wishing doesn’t make it so

Yesterday’s report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syria to the UN Human Rights Commission is an extraordinary piece of work, even if I find myself balking at its treacly opposition to arms supplies.  Do they really think blocking the availability of weapons to the opposition would limit the violence?

But that is a quibble.  The report in many other respects is a paragon of international community virtue.  It catalogues the horrors of the war with precision and restraint:

This report documents for the first time the systematic imposition of sieges, the use of chemical agents and forcible displacement.  War crimes, crimes against humanity and gross human rights violations continue apace.  Referral to justice remains paramount.

While documenting abuses on both sides, the report is clear about proportions:

The violations and abuses committed by anti-Government armed groups did not, however, reach the intensity and scale of those committed by Government forces and militia.

Read more

Tags : ,

Self-determined

I spent a couple of hours yesterday afternoon with the leading lights of Kosovo’s “Self-Determination” movement, Albin Kurti and Shpend Ahmeti.  They appeared with Albanian flag lapel pins at a SAIS panel moderated by Mike Haltzel, with our colleague Ed Joseph (formerly OSCE deputy in Pristina) and me commenting.  I apologize in advance for an inadequate writeup:  I find it hard to take notes on an event in which I also participate.

I had to admit being out of my intellectual depth, as Albin launched with reference to a decade-old speech of Carl Bildt and an equally obscure reference to Robert Cooper’s (don’t worry if you don’t know who he is) work.  I confess I lack such erudition.  But his point was that these luminaries concern themselves not with building states but improving relations between them.  Albin and Shpend view the international community as too focused on short-term stability.  They would prefer to devote their energies to the economic and social development of Kosovo and its entire population, rather than its relations with Belgrade or its relationship to the Serb-occupied northern bit of the country.   They fear creation of an autonomous Serb “entity” in Kosovo (like Republika Srpska in Bosnia) and want reciprocity with Serbia, not Serbian interference in how Kosovo governs itself.  There is a risk that the agreement will separate rather than integrate.

That would all be dandy, but circumstances have not allowed those who do govern the luxury of ignoring Serbia, which is Kosovo’s biggest neighbor, greatest security threat, largest potential market and occupier of 3.5 of its northern municipalities.  There really is reason to be concerned about stability.  So the Kosovo government negotiated an agreement with Belgrade that Albin and Shpend dislike, claiming it obligates only Pristina, not Belgrade, and fails to get Kosovo either recognition or UN membership.  The EU is not a neutral third party, they claim, because it also plays an executive role in Kosovo through its rule of law mission (EULEX). Read more

Tags :
Tweet