Ahmed Rashid in the FT tries to convey how the world looks in the eyes of President Karzai: he sees in the West mixed messages, inability to get Pakistan to do the right things, a cacophony of ambassadors, vacillation about staying and going, unfair criticism, and manufactured rumors of mental imbalance. Preparing for NATO departure, the President is reasserting Afghan nationalism and trying to cut deals with the Taliban supported by Pakistan and Iran.
Larry Korb reporting from Kabul confirms that the President is largely in tune with others there, who are frustrated and unappreciative of the Administration’s surge and other efforts.
Meanwhile, in Lisbon NATO is preparing to reaffirm July 2011 as the beginning of its drawdown, with 2014 as the target date for completing the turnover of primary security responsibility to Kabul (a training/mentoring mission would remain). This reflects political feasibility in Europe and the U.S. as much as it does Afghan reality, but it is still an enormous additional investment. The question remains: is Karzai worth the candle? But it is the kind of question that won’t be asked once this NATO Summit has set its course.
The Israelis are the victors for now. With authority comes responsibility. They need to make…
Only people can force the P5 leaders to undertake the way out of the catastrophic…
A lot of people could get killed in a peace operation of this difficulty. The…
Trump's America is a place where freedom of speech is in doubt, right-wing violence is…
The Trump Administration's 20-point peace plan for Gaza calls for the unconditional surrender, disarmament and…
They can and sometimes do, provided they organize well and rely on expertise to develop…