Ahmed Rashid in the FT tries to convey how the world looks in the eyes of President Karzai: he sees in the West mixed messages, inability to get Pakistan to do the right things, a cacophony of ambassadors, vacillation about staying and going, unfair criticism, and manufactured rumors of mental imbalance. Preparing for NATO departure, the President is reasserting Afghan nationalism and trying to cut deals with the Taliban supported by Pakistan and Iran.
Larry Korb reporting from Kabul confirms that the President is largely in tune with others there, who are frustrated and unappreciative of the Administration’s surge and other efforts.
Meanwhile, in Lisbon NATO is preparing to reaffirm July 2011 as the beginning of its drawdown, with 2014 as the target date for completing the turnover of primary security responsibility to Kabul (a training/mentoring mission would remain). This reflects political feasibility in Europe and the U.S. as much as it does Afghan reality, but it is still an enormous additional investment. The question remains: is Karzai worth the candle? But it is the kind of question that won’t be asked once this NATO Summit has set its course.
President Trump’s decision to kill the Iran nuclear deal was an obvious failure. Lack of…
As I prepare to leave Kyiv Wednesday, here are notes on issues not covered in…
Western appeasement would be a serious mistake. Ending Putin's threat to Ukraine will prevent war…
Whatever the strengths and weaknesses on the Ukrainian side, Moscow will not implement whatever it…
We shouldn't expect world class museums, performances, and universities. When we find them, they merit…
I'll be speaking at the Kyiv School of Economics Monday, also via Zoom. Please join:…