Ahmed Rashid in the FT tries to convey how the world looks in the eyes of President Karzai: he sees in the West mixed messages, inability to get Pakistan to do the right things, a cacophony of ambassadors, vacillation about staying and going, unfair criticism, and manufactured rumors of mental imbalance. Preparing for NATO departure, the President is reasserting Afghan nationalism and trying to cut deals with the Taliban supported by Pakistan and Iran.
Larry Korb reporting from Kabul confirms that the President is largely in tune with others there, who are frustrated and unappreciative of the Administration’s surge and other efforts.
Meanwhile, in Lisbon NATO is preparing to reaffirm July 2011 as the beginning of its drawdown, with 2014 as the target date for completing the turnover of primary security responsibility to Kabul (a training/mentoring mission would remain). This reflects political feasibility in Europe and the U.S. as much as it does Afghan reality, but it is still an enormous additional investment. The question remains: is Karzai worth the candle? But it is the kind of question that won’t be asked once this NATO Summit has set its course.
An enterprising journalist needs to discover what Trump got to convince him to do something…
Lots more criminals are looking for Trump favors. If this decision betokens support to unbridled…
My time in Kyiv in May taught me that Ukrainians will not yield to Russian…
Hashim looked at the KLA commander with him, who scowled, and turned back to me…
Once the war is over, getting Ukraine into NATO would be a major contribution to…
The Israelis are the victors for now. With authority comes responsibility. They need to make…