Time to act

Here is President Obama’s statement from three days ago:

I am deeply concerned by reports of violence in Bahrain, Libya and Yemen. The United States condemns the use of violence by governments against peaceful protesters in those countries and wherever else it may occur. We express our condolences to the family and friends of those who have been killed during the demonstrations. Wherever they are, people have certain universal rights including the right to peaceful assembly. The United States urges the governments of Bahrain, Libya and Yemen to show restraint in responding to peaceful protests, and to respect the rights of their people.

This statement had a good impact in Bahrain, where the monarchy saved its skin by withdrawing army and policy from Pearl square and allowing the Crown Prince to make a truly conciliatory statement.

But today was a day of carnage in Libya according to many reports: jet fighters strafing demonstrators, thugs shooting into crowds, perhaps 250 fatalities. While the State Department has expressed “grave concern” and ordered an evacuation of its own personnel, President Obama has been silent and no specific counter-action, even an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, has been announced. We need to hear from the President what he is prepared to do.

It is time to act.  The Twittersphere is full of recommendations for a no-fly zone, which would be fine by me if the UN Security Council can move quickly to order one.  I am not convinced that unilateral U.S. action along those lines would be welcomed even among the protesters in Libya, and we should note that it would prevent defections like the two colonels who flew to Malta today. But letting it be known that one or more aircraft carriers is moving towards North Africa even before the UNSC acts could inhibit some of Gaddafi’s worst behavior.

What else could be done?  The Arab League is said to be meeting tomorrow to discuss Libya.  That is only a good thing if they drop their usual hesitancy to criticize a reigning sovereign and denounce Gaddafi’s attacks on his own people.  I hope the Americans are demarching (that diplomatese for talking to/asking) every Arab League capital by morning pointing out that what Gaddafi is doing is counterproductive and will rouse the public in many other countries.

In any event, I trust the Americans are making it clear in Tripoli that what is going on needs to stop right away.  It is not only Libya that is at risk–if Gaddafi succeeds in his effort to repress the demonstrators, which is possible though unlikely–you’ll see every tyrant in the Middle East copying his lead.  That would not be a pretty picture.

PS:  A few more things the UNSC could do:  freeze assets and ban travel of regime principals, prohibit arms sales, send the Secretary General to Tripoli to negotiate for deployment of a group of observers.

admin

Share
Published by
admin

Recent Posts

Good news, finally, but unlikely to last

Those of us looking for a Ukrainian military victory, a Palestinian state that will live…

1 week ago

Kosovo is more qualified than Serbia

The sad fact is that non-member Kosovo today is more qualified for CoE membership than…

2 weeks ago

Proactive would be better

The legal profession could also constitute an international nongovernmental group to advise on conflict issues…

2 weeks ago

The wider war has arrived, when will peace?

The wider war has arrived, but until there is decisively new leadership in both Tehran…

2 weeks ago

A good lesson in diplomacy

It really is a good lesson in diplomacy: anticipate trouble, try to prevent it, and…

2 weeks ago

Equality is for everyone

It is high time for Israeli practice to rise to the level of Jewish ideals.…

1 month ago