Day: December 14, 2011

What does Kosovo’s president represent?

Kosovo President Atifete Jahjaga’s speech today at SAIS was what I had hoped.  She was forward-looking, even while reviewing the sad history of oppression from 1989 until the NATO intervention in 1999.  She was clear about Kosovo’s status as a sovereign and independent state, even if it has not achieved universal recognition and membership in international organizations.  She was hopeful about Kosovo’s European aspirations, while recognizing the many challenges that have to be faced, including normalization of relations with Serbia through the EU-sponsored dialogue.  She was forceful about Kosovo’s territorial integrity, while emphasizing the rights of the Serbian community under the Ahtisaari plan.   She underlined the importance of reintegration of the northern muncipalities, but called for an economic development plan encompassing south Mitrovica as well.

Plucked from a successful career in the Kosovo police, President Jahjaga is quickly establishing herself as a symbol of Kosovo’s youthful aspirations.  She is trying hard to represent all of Kosovo’s ethnic communities, not just the majority Albanians, and to stay above the political fray.  She embodies commitment to rule of law–her entire career prior to becoming president was spent in law school and the much-respected police service.  And though she did not mention it today, she symbolizes the aspirations of Kosovo’s women for a stronger role in a society in which male politicians dominate.

What more could I have asked for?  In response to my opening question about pursuing criminals responsible for crime against Serbs south of the Ibar, she emphasized mainly Pristina’s inability to get the full benefit of cooperation with international police organizations, of which Kosovo is not yet a member.  I might have liked to hear something more about encouraging all citizens to protect their neighbors and support the authorities in maintaining law and order.

She was clear about protection of minority communities, but a colleague noted that he would have liked to hear more about how all the ethnic groups of Kosovo share a common history and culture.  The beautiful Serb monasteries of Kosovo should be a source of pride to Albanians as well as to Serbs.  The maintenance of separate, and conflicting, historical narratives is a serious obstacle to reconciliation in Kosovo, as it is elsewhere in the Balkans.

Asked whether she would come to Belgrade to meet President Tadic, she responded she would go anywhere to meet anyone so long as it was clearly understood that she is the president of a sovereign and independent state.  That is not likely to happen soon, since Serbia will have elections next spring.  But the time will come.  If Jahjaga is still president when it does, Kosovo will be well represented.

A few minutes in the “green” room before the talk with President Atifete Jahjaga and Minister for European Integration Vlora Çitaku (that’s Ambassador Avni Spahiu hiding behind me):

 

 

Tags : , ,

Syria options: quick failure or slow success

While I was enjoying a good discussion yesterday of mainly diplomatic Syria options over at Brookings (co-sponsored by the Middle East Institute), military experts at the Washington Institute were publishing an assessment of options for military intervention.

My bottom line:  the “harder” military options, whether by the dissident-manned Free Syrian Army (FSA) or by external powers, are unlikely to be effective.  Nonviolent options–multilateral diplomacy combined with continuing protests–have a much better chance for success, but they may take a long time.  Where I come from, if the choice is between failing quickly and succeeding slowly, wisdom chooses slow success. But that also means sustaining the protesters for longer than they can last without help.

The Brookings/MEI event feature three of the very best on Syria:  Murhaf Jouejati, who is now in the Syrian National Council (SNC), Ömer Taşpınar of Brookings and SAIS, and Andrew Tabler of the Washington Institute.

Murhaf Jouejati set a good pace:  the Barbara Walters interview showed Bashar al Assad for what he is: a liar.  There is no disconnection from reality.  He is determined to stay in power and use any means to do so.  The U.S. sanctions have had a psychological effect but the European Union sanctions are far more important, especially the ban on importing Syrian oil.  The big blows were the Turkish sanctions and the Arab League decision, which is to be implemented beginning December 27.  This deprived Bashar of his claim to be an Arab champion.

The impact is substantial.  Oil revenue is down, tourism is disappearing, the dinar has lost value, heating oil is scarce.  The revolutionaries are shifting from street protests to strikes and boycotts, which are less dangerous.  The SNC is coordinating with the Free Syrian Army (FSA), which says it is committed to defensive actions.  There are differences between the SNC and the National Coordinating Committee, a group inside Syria that is opposed to international intervention and prepared to talk with the regime, while the SNC would like international intervention to protect civilians and hasten collapse (and wants talks only on transition once Bashar has agreed to step down).  Without outside intervention, regime implosion could take a long time. The Arab League proposal for international monitors has potential, but we need to get them in as quickly as possible, something Bashar is unlikely to agree to.

Ömer Taşpınar thinks two factors drive Turkish behavior on Syria:  the damage Bashar has done to its “zero problems with neighbors policy” and a growing sentiment of Sunni solidarity, fed by disgust with Bashar’s continuation of the crackdown during Ramadan.  Turkey does not want to be seen as supporting Western initiatives on Syria or following a U.S. lead.  Ankara wants to see multilateral, especially UN Security Council, backing for whatever is done.  It will not likely take unilateral action. The U.S. needs to be more effective diplomatically with Russia and China.  The SNC needs to prepare and publish its vision for post-Assad Syria.

Andrew Tabler sees the U.S. as having been slow to react correctly to events in Syria, but it has now come around and is reaching out to the opposition, which is both grandiose in its ambitions and depressed in its mood.  It is at a crossroads and needs to decide whether to use violence.  The de facto contact group (U.S., France, Germany, UK, and Turkey, which should be augmented with Arab countries) needs to consider humanitarian corridors or buffer zones.   The protests should remain nonviolent to preserve political and moral advantage.  Sanctions have to be targeted to “break off” key regime pillars.  The most likely to fall are the Sunni businessmen, who are already hedging their bets.

The military options published by the Washington Institute range from the silly to the unpromising.  Humanitarian corridors into Syria’s cities?  Apart from the fact that they don’t appear to be needed, they would impossible to sustain if the regime decided it did not want them.  Buffer zones or enclaves along the Turkish border?  That requires suppression of a substantial Syrian air defense system and constant vigilance thereafter, in the air and on the ground.  Without it, the buffer zones just become unprotected targets, like the Safe Areas during the Bosnian war.  That’s where you are sure to find your enemies, so that is where you aim.  No-fly zone?  It’s a bad joke, since the regime is not using aircraft to repress demonstrations. It would just be the top of the slippery slope to broader intervention.

In the end, the Washington Institute resorts to that next to last refuge of scoundrels, covert action:

…even covert intervention would buoy the opposition’s morale, while signaling to Damascus that events are moving against it, that external powers are willing to run risks to aid the population, and that the opposition has important allies. Taken together, these developments could significantly alter the dynamic of the Syrian struggle.

I’m all for doing whatever we can to get the Syrian opposition the money, cell phones, fuel and other supplies they need to sustain nonviolent protest, but “covert action” has a serious record of compromising whoever accepts it and failing to produce good results.

My conclusion:  the Arab League proposal for human rights monitors is the best idea out there.  If Bashar rejects them,  it is one more nail in his coffin.  If he accepts them, they are likely to report on atrocities and help to end his regime.  I just hope the Arab League has 500 of them ready and willing if he does accept.  A UN Security Council resolution calling for their deployment would be a giant step in the right direction.  That’s a tall order for our diplomats, but one worthy of their efforts.

 

 

 

Tags : , , , ,
Tweet