I generally shy away from trumpeting my son’s fine writing over at Mother Jones, but this graphic from his latest post caught my eye:
For those who may wonder what the relationship is between American presidents and attacks on U.S. diplomatic targets, that’s just the point: there is none, even if it looks to me as if the numbers might support the thesis that democratic administrations suffer fewer such attacks on average than their predecessors. But the Romney campaign is claiming its man would prevent such attacks by projecting strength. Fat chance.
Note to Paul Ryan: Marine guards are not trained to protect ambassadors. Their primary responsibility is to protect the information in the embassy. In a crisis, they help protect the embassy itself, but primary responsibility for that lies with the host government. If host government protection is inadequate, the embassy beefs up private security guards and the ambassador gets a personal security detail of people trained for that purpose (usually private contractors), not marine guards.
A war criminal can die, while the ideology that made him a hero survives. That…
We are witnessing a new variation on Milan Kundera’s famous *The Joke*: “Optimism is opium…
It is high time to get on with the serious business of governing, which includes…
Belgrade talks the talk, takes the EU money, and does nearly nothing. It is time…
Allowing the powers that be in the region to reach their own equilibrium, with US…
Trump has promised an agreement with Iran that can't be reached while Iran and Oman…