Harvard wins in Liberia

The November 8 runoff for President in Liberia will apparently pit Ellen Johnson Sirleaf against Winston Tubman.  Nobel Prize winner Sirleaf won the first round handily, with over 40% of the votes (based on a preliminary and partial count).   Election day was peaceful and the electoral mechanism seems to have performed reasonably well.  The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) observer mission said “on the whole, the elections of October 11, 2011 were conducted under acceptable conditions of freedom of voters and transparency of the process.”  Maybe not the highest praise, but good for a country in dire economic conditions and still recovering from several ferocious civil wars.

This is a credit to the Harvard-educated (Kennedy School MPA) Sirleaf, who is certainly now the odds on favorite.   But her opponent is not to be minimized.  Also Harvard-educated (law school), he heads a ticket that includes as candidate for vice president George Weah, Liberia’s star footballer.  Weah beat Sirleaf in the first round of the last presidential election but lost to her in the second. Tubman and Weah criticize Sirleaf for failing to revive the economy, tolerating corruption and once backing Charles Taylor, the former president who is on trial for war crimes.  She says they would disrupt the great progress Liberia has made.

The votes of the third-place finisher, Prince Johnson, will influence the outcome.  Johnson, whose iconic moment was presiding over the torture and murder of former President Doe, is now a born again Christian.  I wouldn’t want to know the price of getting him to throw his support to one or the other of the candidates.

But whoever wins, the story is likely to be a relatively good one, provided the second round occurs in the same fairly benign atmosphere that prevailed in the first.  It will do Sirleaf no good to win if the election is not clean and peaceful.  In any event, Liberians seem anxious to continue what Sirleaf has started, which is one of the best post-war evolutions of the past twenty years.  Some will complain that many of the drivers of conflict are still in place, as are many perpetrators of violence.  But there is something to be said for people who want to look forward, and even more to be said for those who genuinely want to root out the violence and cronyism that has plagued Liberia for far too long.

So the news is pretty good, which means you won’t read a lot about it in the American press, which is leaving Liberia to AP.  But my hat is off to the UN peacekeepers and civilians of all stripes who have worked hard in recent years to normalize Liberia, which is a tough, poor and deprived country.  So much goes wrong in this world, we should take notice when things come out right.

 

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer
Tags: Liberia

Recent Posts

De-escalation is the way to go

President Trump is stuck in a war he should never have even thought about starting.…

15 hours ago

Getting rid of what works, and what doesn’t

The regime was arguably on its last legs when the Israelis and Americans attacked. It…

7 days ago

Intersections, not convergence

The best way to generate international norms for technology is in what we call in…

1 week ago

Statehood and language

Albanian as an official language is a right, a reflection of the state’s multiethnic character,…

2 weeks ago

Iran lost militarily but won strategically

The war is ending with the strait of Hormuz in Iranian control. The US and…

2 weeks ago

Trump is desperate, the Iranians are winning

Trump is now desperate to end the war before it causes more damage to the…

2 weeks ago