Categories: Daniel Serwer

Trouble in Kosovo comes from Serbia

I did this interview for Spat Blakcori of Pristina’s TV1 yesterday:

Q: It has been more than 2 weeks since there are barricades in the North of Mitrovica. KFOR has yet to make a move and remove the barricades. Do you think they should act immediately?

A: They should not have allowed the barricades, but now that they are there they need to proceed with caution.

Q: What do you think about the criminal groups in the North of Mitrovica. Should Vucic be responsible for their actions?

A: Yes, they are agents of the Serbian secret service for which he is responsible. None of this would be happening without Vucic’s approval. Brnabic’s tweets are confirmation of that.

Q: Do you think that the approach of the West is too soft towards the Serbian president?

A: Yes. I don’t understand why the West has failed to react appropriately to Vucic’s provocations, which are blatant and obvious. I fear there are those in both Washington and Brussels who sympathize with Belgrade’s effort to establish separate governance for Serbs in northern Kosovo.

I also did this one for Luli Gajtani of RTV Dukagjini:

Q: How do you see the situation created in the north of Kosovo, what do you think would be a long-term solution that would no longer produce tensions?

A: The long term solution will be mutual recognition and decentralized governance in Kosovo, which already exists.

Q: Should the forces of KFOR or the Police of Kosovo forcefully remove the barricades located in the northern municipalities of Kosovo, or do you see another solution?

A: They should not have allowed construction of the barricades, but now they need to be cautious in removing them. Negotiation from a position of strength would be my preference.

Q: Serbia has admitted that the barricades were placed with their permission, how do you think the international community should act?

A: There should be consequences. Brussels and Washington are better equipped than I am to figure out what those should be.

Q: Do you think that Miroslav Lajcak and Josep Borrell should intensify the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue? Do you think that the dialogue would speed up the solution of the problems in the north of Kosovo?

A: I doubt they can speed up the dialogue without levying consequences for Belgrade, which has intentionally destabilized northern Kosovo in order to block progress in the dialogue. 

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

Farewell to failure

That is the practical direction in which prospects for success lie. Farewell to failure requires…

5 hours ago

The Gaza war will likely continue

The Gaza war isn't over and may continue for a long time still.

2 days ago

See no evil is not good policy

Doing something about Serbia's malfeasance requires heavy political lifting. Why take that on if no…

5 days ago

Good news, finally, but unlikely to last

Those of us looking for a Ukrainian military victory, a Palestinian state that will live…

3 weeks ago

Kosovo is more qualified than Serbia

The sad fact is that non-member Kosovo today is more qualified for CoE membership than…

3 weeks ago

Proactive would be better

The legal profession could also constitute an international nongovernmental group to advise on conflict issues…

3 weeks ago