Month: March 2014

Putin has put Obama on the spot

Though events have moved quickly, it is already apparent that there is little the United States can do to get Russia to leave Crimea any time soon.  The proposals from left and right for action are nowhere near sufficient to get Vladimir Putin to reverse his successful military seizure of the province’s vital security and governance installations.  American military action is not in the cards.  While the West notes Russia’s inconsistency in violating the principle of sovereignty, Putin even claims legal justification:  the province’s prime minister asked for help, which he says is permissible under Russia’s security agreements with Kiev.

The most immediate requirement is not to push Russia out of Crimea, which may take a decade or more.   Washington lacks non-military means capable of doing it, and no one is advocating war with Russia over Ukraine.  But Moscow, successful in Crimea, may well be thinking of similar takeovers in other southern and eastern provinces with large Russian-speaking populations that voted for Viktor Yanukovich: Read more

Tags : , , , , ,

Left and right are shooting blanks

Hayes Brown over at ThinkProgress suggests five ways the US can respond to Russia invading Ukraine without going to war.

It’s a brave attempt.  But nothing he cites will suffice to get the Russians out of Crimea:

  1. Suspending Russia’s membership in the G-8 would be a pinprick to Moscow.  It has never cared as much about the G-8 as we would have like it to.  In any event, the G-8 has yielded economic leadership to the G-20 and hasn’t produced much in the 8 years since it first met in Russia.  President Putin boycotted the 2012 meeting at Camp David.  He cares that much.
  2. Placing travel bans on Putin and his family is symbolic, not substantial.  The Europeans likely won’t go along.  The man doesn’t vacation a lot in the US.
  3. Trade (and I would say financial) sanctions are a serious proposition, but there are real limits to what we are permitted to do by our World Trade Organization obligations and by our concern about damage to the global financial structure.  Trade and financial sanctions won’t have much impact unless a good part of the rest of the world goes along with them, which isn’t likely.
  4. Suspension of NATO cooperation and participation.  The Russians have never much appreciated their post-Cold War relationship with NATO.  Few in Moscow would cry over this spilled milk.
  5. Accelerate missile defense.  This would require a dramatic turnaround both in the US and Europe in favor of missile defenses few think are terribly important or will work.  And it would cost a bundle. Read more
Tags : , , ,

It’s all over but the shouting

1.  Former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich held his first press conference yesterday since fleeing Kiev in Rostov on Don, in southern Russia not far from the Sea of Azov (and Crimea).  He was not in Moscow and has only talked to Russian President Putin by phone.  Putin has not committed to back Yanukovich’s claim to still being President, or his insistence on Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

2.  President Obama went to the briefing room to warn Russia

the United States will stand with the international community in affirming that there will be costs for any military intervention in Ukraine.

What those costs might be is not clear.  There are rumors of canceling a G-8 meeting, which won’t bring tears to Russian eyes.

3.  The Prime Minister of Crimea has asked Putin for help.  Security contractors who work for the Russian military have taken over Crimea’s airports and pro-Russian paramilitaries have taken over government buildings in the province.  Russian helicopters have flown into Crimea. Read more

Tags : , ,
Tweet