Tag: Burma

The end is nigh, once again

2013 is ending with a lot of doom and gloom:

  • South Sudan, the world’s newest state, is suffering bloodletting between political rivals, who coincide with its two largest tribes (Dinka and Nuer).
  • The Central African Republic is imploding in an orgy of Christian/Muslim violence.
  • North Korea is risking internal strife as its latest Kim exerts his authority by purging and executing his formally powerful uncle.
  • China is challenging Japan and South Korea in the the East China Sea.
  • Syria is in chaos, spelling catastrophe for most of its population and serious strains for all its neighbors.
  • Nuclear negotiations with Iran seem slow, if not stalled.
  • Egypt‘s military is repressing not only the Muslim Brotherhood but also secular human rights advocates.
  • Israel and Palestine still seem far from agreement on the two-state solution most agree is their best bet.
  • Afghanistan‘s President Karzai is refusing to sign the long-sought security agreement with the United States, putting at risk continued presence of US troops even as the Taliban seem to be strengthening in the countryside, and capital and people are fleeing Kabul.
  • Al Qaeda is recovering as a franchised operation (especially in Iraq, Syria, Yemen and North Africa), even as its headquarters in Pakistan has been devastated.
  • Ukraine is turning eastward, despite the thousands of brave protesters in Kiev’s streets.

The Economist topped off the gloom this week by suggesting that the current international situation resembles the one that preceded World War I:  a declining world power (then Great Britain, now the US) unable to ensure global security and a rising challenger (then Germany now China). Read more

Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The world according to CFR

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) survey of prevention priorities for 2014 is out today.  Crowdsourced, it is pretty much the definition of elite conventional wisdom. Pundits of all stripes contribute.

The top tier includes contingencies with high impact and moderate likelihood (intensification of the Syrian civil war, a cyberattack on critical US infrastructure, attacks on the Iranian nuclear program or evidence of nuclear weapons intent, a mass casualty terrorist attack on the US or an ally, or a severe North Korean crisis) as well as those with moderate impact and high likelihood (in a word “instability” in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Iraq or Jordan).  None merited the designation high impact and high likelihood, though many of us might have suggested Syria, Iraq  and Pakistan for that category. Read more

Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Peace picks, December 2-6

After a week of Thanksgiving festivities, here are this week’s top events:

1. CHP’s Vision for Turkey: An Address by Chairman Kılıçdaroğlu

Monday, December 2 | 11:30am – 1:00pm

Brookings Institution, Falk Auditorium, 1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW

REGISTER TO ATTEND

On December 2, the Center on the United States and Europe at Brookings will host Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, chairman of Turkey’s main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP), for an address on Turkey, its foreign policy and its relations with the United States. In his remarks, Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu will offer CHP’s vision for the future of Turkey with a particular focus on Turkish democracy and economics. He will also reflect on Turkey’s role in its neighborhood and offer thoughts on its transatlantic relations.

Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu has served as the chair of the Republican People’s Party since May 2010. He was first elected in 2002 as a member of the Turkish Parliament for the Istanbul province. He was reelected as an MP in 2007 and served as CHP’s Group Vice President until declaring his candidacy for the leadership of the party. Prior to his political career, Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu served in numerous high-ranking positions in the Turkish Ministry of Finance and the Social Security Organization.

Senior Fellow Ted Piccone, acting vice president and director of Foreign Policy at Brookings, will introduce Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu. At the conclusion of his remarks, Brookings TUSIAD Senior Fellow Kemal Kirişci will moderate the discussion. After the program, Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu will take audience questions.

Introduction
Ted Piccone
Acting Vice President and Director, Foreign Policy
The Brookings Institution
Moderator
Kemal Kirişci
TUSIAD Senior Fellow and Director, Turkey Project
The Brookings Institution
Featured Speaker
Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu
Chairman
Republican People’s Party

Read more

Tags : , , , , , , , , , , ,

No questions are a bad sign

Myanmar’s President Thein Sein put on a good show at SAIS yesterday.  In his prepared remarks, he talked about:

  • His country’s transition from autocracy to an open society and democracy;
  • Ending Myanmar’s isolation and its internal, communal wars;
  • Bringing perpetrators to justice;
  • Pursuing national dialogue;
  • Establishing the state on the basis of the people’s sovereignty;
  • Opening the economy in a way that is fair to all;
  • Taking advantage of Myanmar’s geopolitical situation in a resurgent Asia;
  • Protecting the natural environment;
  • Reforming the military;
  • Opening the political system to multiple parties, civil society and free elections;
  • The coming of age of a new generation unburdened by past conflicts;
  • Meeting the challenges of natural disasters, sea-level rise and epidemics;
  • Broadening the concept of national identity and finding ways to work together to build the state and nation.

All this he noted will require compromise, tolerance and patience.  It will also require going beyond the 10 ceasefires already in place to another imminent one with the Kachin.  The ceasefires will have to be made sustainable by devolution, resource-sharing and broad popular support.

What more can a proper 21st century American professor ask of a former dictator?

Then two things happened that cast a shadow on the event:  he did not take questions, and when I got back to the office news of a two-child limit on Muslims in an area where they are already subject to ethnic cleansing reached me.  I already knew that the President had not fulfilled his commitments on a number of reform issues.

So what are we to make of this virtually impeccable speech and a less than perfect record?  I wouldn’t doubt Thein Sein’s sincerity.  I thought his speech written in Washington (a couple of well-informed colleagues disagreed), but he read it with conviction and the things it said were vigorous.  He’ll have to wear them when he gets home.  But his performance in an interview at the Washington Post was at times been opaque and at times defensive of the military role in Myanmar.

Thein Sein is a transition figure who can’t avoid the contradictions of his transitional position, even if he was unequivocal in describing the regime he spent his career in as an autocracy. He said a lot of the right things.  What was missing in the presentation was however something fundamental:  he never mentioned human rights.  The transition he was describing was an elite-decided and elite-led transition, not one respectful of the rights of individuals.

Had there been a Q and A session, I and likely others would have explored this lacuna.  That is only proper, in particular at a university event.  It’s only the second time in many years of attending such events that I remember no Q and A.  The last time was more than 10 years ago, when Michael Armitage appeared as deputy secretary of state at USIP to justify the Iraq war.  No questions then either.  It was a bad sign.

Tags : , ,

Odd duck

I livetweeted Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan’s appearance in Washington at SETA (a Turkish thinktank for political, economic social research) yesterday, but the performance merited more.  Maybe my numerous Turkish readers will find it interesting, even if the Americans don’t.  I rarely attend such high-level public events, as little new gets said.

But Erdogan did not disappoint.  Speaking in Turkish (I was listening to the simultaneous translation), his main theme was this:

no justice means no humanity, no dignity, and no peace.

He went on to talk about the “bottom billion” living on less than $1 per day, most of whom are innocent children, as well as the suffering in Somalia and Darfur.  Personally moved by starvation and circumcision done with a simple knife on several children, he underlined the injustice of racism and discrimination, referring in particular to violence against Muslims in Myanmar.

Lack of justice in one place is a threat to justice elsewhere.  Palestine is not a territorial issue but a justice issue.  Israeli settlements are making a two-state solution impossible.  Israel should release Palestinian prisoners and end the blockade.  Hamas will have to be at the negotiating table.  It was elected and then denied the right to govern.  Israel has apologized for its raid on the Turkish aid flotilla.  Compensation is under discussion.  Then Turkey will press for an end to the occupation.

The twentieth century was one of war and injustice.  The twenty-first century should be one of peace and justice.  Turkish policy is based on justice and humanity.  This is why Turkey supported the people in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria.  But the UN Security Council is doing nothing.  The system is blocked, and wrong.  Humanity cannot be in the hands of one or two countries; the system has to be changed.  Events like those of the 1990s in Bosnia and Rwanda are happening again, but the Security Council is doing nothing.

A world in which babies are slaughtered is not a religious world.  This is not honorable and it makes me mad.  When you witness things of this sort, you have a responsibility.  Why is the media not covering the slaughter in Banias (Syria)?  The babies dying are not only their parents, but also ours.  You have to act.  You have to stop these things.  Society shares responsibility for this evil.  There is a need for global conscience and justice.  We have to see that the elements bringing us together are stronger than those that drive us apart.  We have to help the poor and the weak. We cannot step on each other and remain connected to our ideals and faith.

Somewhere around this point, Erdogan took a diversion that I wasn’t able to capture tweeting but I’ll try to reproduce here.  God’s justice, he said, is ever present but manifests itself at different times and places.  He reminded the audience of the Koranic phrase

Bismillah al rahman al rahim

This is generally translated

In the name of God, most Gracious, most Compassionate

But, Erdogan said, its real meaning is that God has two aspects.  The first he shows to everyone on earth during their lifetimes.  This is the same for everyone (most Gracious).  The second is reserved for the faithful in the afterlife (most Compassionate).  I’m no theologian, but this struck me as a millenarian concept rather similar to that of the raptured Christians or the Puritans’ “elect.” No ecumenism in this second aspect.  Only true believers enter heaven.

I imagine some aide in the front row was figuratively urging him to move on at this point, which is what he did.  Turkey will fulfill its obligations, Erdogan said.  We want to see more countries concerned about Syria, where the regime does not control much of the territory but uses its weapons to fire on the population.  Asad has fired hundreds of missiles and used sarin gas.

President Obama is trying to do the right thing, but what is needed is UN Security Council action, which would accelerate the process.  Russia needs to step forward.  Turkey will continue to cooperate with Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

In the Q and A, Erdogan said he would go soon to Gaza and the West Bank (he did not mention Israel). He is against war, but sometimes justice requires it.  The clergy should help us avoid getting to that point by reaching across borders.  An EU/US trade agreement is a fine idea, but it will need to take into account Turkey’s interests, as Turkey has a customs union with the EU.  Turkey will continue to press China on respecting the rights of the Uighurs.

The session ended without questions about Kurds inside Turkey, imprisonment of journalists or other human rights violations.  As questions were submitted in writing, the moderator presumably tossed those.

This is an odd duck:  a religious and social conservative who has instituted vigorous free market economic reforms but also holds liberal internationalist views on the world, while ignoring those views when it comes to internal politics and human rights.

 

Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ten things the president should be doing

Herewith my short list of ten international issues more worthy of presidential attention than the issues that are getting it this week:

  1. Drones:  Apparently the President is preparing to address how and why he uses them soon.
  2. Syria:  Secretary of State Kerry and the Russians are ginning up a peace conference next month, while Moscow strengthens Syrian defenses against Western intervention.
  3. Iraq:  The Syrian war is spilling over and posing serious challenges to the country’s political cohesion.
  4. Egypt:  President Morsi is taking the Arab world’s most populous country in economically and politically ruinous directions.
  5. Israel/Palestine:  With the peace process moribund, the window is closing on the opportunity to reach a two-state outcome.
  6. Libya:  The failure to establish the state’s monopoly on the legitimate use of force leaves open the possibility of further attacks on Americans (and on the Libyan state).
  7. Afghanistan:  The American withdrawal is on schedule, but big questions remain about what will be left behind.
  8. Pakistan:  Nawaz Sharif’s hat trick provides an opportunity for improved relations, if managed well.
  9. Iran:  once its presidential election is over (first round is June 14, runoff if needed June 21), a last diplomatic effort on its nuclear ambitions will begin.
  10. All that Asia stuff:  North Korean nukes, maritime jostling with China, Trans-Pacific Partnership, transition in Myanmar (how about trying for one in Vietnam?), Japan’s economic and military revival…

In the good old days, presidents in domestic trouble headed out on international trips.  Obama doesn’t seem inclined in that direction.  He really does want to limit America’s commitments abroad and restore its economy at home.  Bless him.  But if things get much worse, I’ll bet on a road trip.

Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Tweet