International Crisis Group has put out its latest on Afghanistan, offering a definitive answer to the question of whether Karzai is worth it:
Any plan that fails to deal with the decay in Kabul will not succeed. President Hamid Karzai no longer enjoys the legitimacy and popularity
he once had and he has subsequently lost his ability to stitch together lasting political deals.
This is followed by a well-documented litany of failures in areas directly relevant to whether the mission as a whole can succeed.
But ICG then somehow manages to turn 180 degrees and recommend, in a backhanded sort of way, engagement rather than exit:
Overcoming the trust deficit between the Afghan government, the Afghan people and the international community will rely on more concerted efforts to increase political representation, to expand access to justice and to confront corruption.
This amounts to no more than wishing it weren’t so–if it wanted to be listened to, ICG would have done better to go where its analysis points: drawdown, presumably on the currently agreed NATO schedule.
There is a long way from Tuesday's victories to that happy scenario. Best not to…
An enterprising journalist needs to discover what Trump got to convince him to do something…
Lots more criminals are looking for Trump favors. If this decision betokens support to unbridled…
My time in Kyiv in May taught me that Ukrainians will not yield to Russian…
Hashim looked at the KLA commander with him, who scowled, and turned back to me…
Once the war is over, getting Ukraine into NATO would be a major contribution to…