International Crisis Group has put out its latest on Afghanistan, offering a definitive answer to the question of whether Karzai is worth it:
Any plan that fails to deal with the decay in Kabul will not succeed. President Hamid Karzai no longer enjoys the legitimacy and popularity
he once had and he has subsequently lost his ability to stitch together lasting political deals.
This is followed by a well-documented litany of failures in areas directly relevant to whether the mission as a whole can succeed.
But ICG then somehow manages to turn 180 degrees and recommend, in a backhanded sort of way, engagement rather than exit:
Overcoming the trust deficit between the Afghan government, the Afghan people and the international community will rely on more concerted efforts to increase political representation, to expand access to justice and to confront corruption.
This amounts to no more than wishing it weren’t so–if it wanted to be listened to, ICG would have done better to go where its analysis points: drawdown, presumably on the currently agreed NATO schedule.
An Administration that favors stability over security, fails to mention democracy and the EU, and…
Accession of Montenegro and Albania would help the EU stake its claim to leadership of…
I am going to repeat that hope that Montenegro will be an EU member in…
Trump touted the Beijing meetings as maybe "the biggest summit ever." That's his usual hyperbole.…
This clip reveals two things about Trump. He has downgraded his goals for the Iran…
The international community, as it used to be called, could be generous. It also makes…