Our friends at the UN Peacebuilding Support Office (thank you David Harland!) have taken a hard look at a long list of limits to international civilian capacity in an e-discussion conducted by the International Stabilization and Peacebuilding Initiative over the past month (Summary of Responses – e-Discussion – UN Review of Intl Civ Cap):
They’ve also looked, less successfully, at planning processes for development of civilian capacities and at bottlenecks that impede deployment: bureaucratic obstacles, insecurity in conflict zones, lengthy recruitment times and civilian logistics limitations.
Perhaps the most innovative part is on interoperability from the UN perspective, where it is clear that despite the obstacles there is sometimes real benefit to the UN drawing on others’ capacities. The natural outcome of this discussion is a series of recommendations for more coordination and coordination bodies, a subject that I confess leaves me cold. I think what all of us need are agreed strategic endstates and frameworks rather than undirected coordination meetings.
Those of us looking for a Ukrainian military victory, a Palestinian state that will live…
The sad fact is that non-member Kosovo today is more qualified for CoE membership than…
The legal profession could also constitute an international nongovernmental group to advise on conflict issues…
The wider war has arrived, but until there is decisively new leadership in both Tehran…
It really is a good lesson in diplomacy: anticipate trouble, try to prevent it, and…
It is high time for Israeli practice to rise to the level of Jewish ideals.…