Gaddafi won’t stop or go

While Bashar al Assad won’t stop the repression in Syria and Ali Abdullah Saleh won’t leave office in Yemen, Muammar Gaddafi is willing to do neither in Libya.

NATO is pounding Gaddafi’s command centers more seriously than in the past, and the Benghazi-based National Transitional Council is gaining diplomatic prominence.  Yesterday, the European Union’s “foreign minister” Catherine Ashton opened an EU office in Benghazi.  I think some Americans are already there, though they have not made a big deal about it. President Obama said in his Middle East speech on Thursday that Gaddafi would “inevitably” leave power–when Americans use the i-word, they usually mean that they are trying hard to make it happen.

The Libyan oil minister has defected, Gaddafi’s wife and daughter are reportedly in Tunisia and the International Criminal Court prosecutor has requested a warrant for his arrest.  As the prosecutor put it:

The evidence shows that Muammar Gaddafi, personally, ordered attacks on unarmed Libyan civilians. His forces attacked Libyan civilians in their homes and in the public space, repressed demonstrations with live ammunition, used heavy artillery against participants in funeral processions, and placed snipers to kill those leaving mosques after the prayers.

Also included in the request to the judges for arrest warrants are Gaddafi’s son Saif al Islam and brother-in-law, who heads the military intelligence service.

This real-time use of judicial proceedings is controversial, as it appears to close off options for Gaddafi and give him an incentive to continue his resistance.  My own view is different.  He has had lots of opportunity to stop the repression and leave Libya.  The arrest warrants, if they are issued, will be a clear and compelling warning to his subordinates that they face the same fate if they don’t act soon to stop Gaddafi’s criminal behavior.

It is impossible to predict how much longer the military campaign against Gaddafi will have to continue before he leaves the scene, one way or the other.  Smarter folks are saying there is a stalemate, but my sense is that Gaddafi’s military capabilities are gradually eroding and that at some point the Libyan people will discover that his fortress is largely empty.  I wouldn’t want to be identifiable as being on his side when that day comes.

PS:  On Saif and his relationship with Muammar, see yesterday’s New York magazine piece, “The Good Bad Son.”

 

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

Three elections, one profound choice

In Serbia, Israel, and the US, corrupt ethnonationalist incumbents are trying to stem a tide…

5 hours ago

Ukraine: the frontline and the future

This promises to be a great event!

1 week ago

Dialogue should not be about the Association

The EU should not insist on the ASM but work on other matters until Serbia…

1 week ago

Two awful messes make an awful world

Putin has good reason to be happy with his "нелега́л" agent in the White House.

1 week ago

Albanian anti-government protests: student revolt and political crisis

For a country seeking European Union membership, this is an important test of democratic resilience…

1 week ago

It’s not just the verdict that is unjust

This is one more lesson in why you shouldn't be too friendly to Washington and…

1 month ago