Diplomatic observers in Syria?

Reading the news from Latakia, it is hard for someone just coming out of Pristina not to note the similarity in military technique between Bashar al Assad’s Syrian forces and Slobodan Milosevic’s Yugoslav forces.

Milosevic aimed more explicitly to cause the Kosovo Albanians to flee their homes, using artillery to put holes in roofs and leaving the bodies of prominent people in the centers of towns.  But the indiscriminate attacks on one neighborhood after another (or one village after the other in Kosovo) seem to the non-military eye comparable. Ditto the rounding up of young people, the random shootings and the mistreatment and torture in prison.

Also similar is the difficulty the rest of the world is having coming to a clear and unequivocal statement against the violence, which Nadim Shehadi notes is the truly complicated side of the equation.  But it is an instructive analogy.  When the international community unified and spoke with a single voice, it was always difficult for Milosevic to continue the violence.

We haven’t had that kind of unity yet vis-a-vis Syria.  The Security Council has managed a statement, but no resolution.  Individual voices have been crystal clear:  I am in Istanbul this evening and read a statement from the Turkish Foreign Minister in the English version of Hurriyet that was unequivocal in demanding that the Syrian regime stop.  We have to make those many voices one.  A Security Council resolution passed with Russian and Chinese support would be the ideal diplomatic vehicle.

There is also a need to operationalize the international community’s concern.  In Kosovo, this was done with the Kosovo Diplomatic Observer Mission (KDOM), an effort agreed to by Milosevic that I felt at the time was too little too late.  But it was a lot more than has been done or even proposed in Syria, where the regime has kept out even the press. And KDOM ultimately had a big impact, when its chief was shown a massacre site and reacted with appropriate horror, calling Milosevic out for what had been done in Serbia’s name.

Diplomatic observers would do what Robert Ford can’t:  be present all over Syria and report on any violations of a ceasefire quickly.  They can only be deployed once Bashar al Assad agrees to stop the military action.  If and when he does, would it be a good idea?

PS:  See Jeff White’s piece, which I don’t seem to be able to HTML:  http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=3393