The Libya analogy does not stop at Benghazi

For those tempted to consider Syrian pleas to establish a “safe area” to protect civilians, Safe Area for Syria:  an Assessment of Legality, Logistics and Hazards, prepared for the Syrian National Council and the Free Syrian Army by the London-based Strategic Research & Communication Center, is a must-read. It suggests:

At present, the most achievable option would be to establish a “safe area” in the country to provide refuge for embattled civilians from other cities and towns, a base of operations for the designated political leadership of the Syrian opposition as well as a military command centre — in other words, a Syrian Benghazi.

The pre-requisite is

…a pre-emptive aerial campaign would have to be waged to neutralize the regime’s air defence systems, particularly in Aleppo and Lattakia and in and around Damascus.

Safe areas come under attack because that is where the enemy is.  The Syrian proposal is not intended to be a safe area like Sarajevo, which during the Bosnian war was declared but no military action taken to protect it until after it was attacked.  Our Syrian colleagues are telling us the safe area they want would require in advance a significant air operation over much of Syria to prevent the shelling and air attacks that naturally result when a “safe area” is declared.

I won’t delve too deeply into the legal side of the paper, except to say that it dreams up some pretty far-fetched schemes because it is clear no UN Security Council resolution authorizing such a safe area can pass over Russian objections.  It is hard to picture any of these schemes passing muster with Pentagon lawyers, and even less with the White House.

But if I am wrong and it turns out they are willing to bite the bullet and destroy Syrian air defenses, the military action won’t stop there.  We’ll soon need to take out Syrian armor and artillery, which will be used to shell the safe area.  And we’ll be doing this at the same time that the Free Syrian Army goes on the offensive.  Sound familiar?  The Libyan analogy does not stop at Benghazi.

What is the alternative?  You see it on unfolding on the ground today in Syria.  The Arab League observers are reportedly in Homs, where the Syrian security forces have wrecked a great deal of damage.  I hope we are encouraging them to stay there, and to spread out to other areas that have been under siege.  I also hope they can communicate directly with people outside Syria.  The presence of the observers will encourage large demonstrations, and increase the risk to the regime of using violence.  The Syrian security forces will play “cat and mouse,” but it is a game the mouse always loses if it goes on long enough.  The Arab League just has to make sure it is a tireless and omnipresent cat.

PS:  Reports today suggest that some Syrian security forces have left Homs as the observers arrived and that the protest there today is large.  Here is what was going on before arrival of the observers: