Less bang, fewer bucks

“Violence is not the way to resolve political disputes,” declared GlobalSolutions.org President Bob Enholm at yesterday’s event, co-sponsored with Partnership for Effective Peacekeeping, about the need for U.S. engagement in peacekeeping operations.  This statement set the tone for the panel, which featured three experienced peacekeepers including Lynn Holland, the first American woman to participate in a UN peacekeeping operation.  The speakers focused on the advantages of peacekeeping and reasons the U.S. should increase its participation.

Holland, now at PAE, came to peacekeeping through police work in the United States.  She volunteered to join for two weeks a project in Haiti that would train police personnel.  After six months, she decided that she could not go back to writing tickets in the U.S. so she followed what she described as a “calling” into several other countries as a peacekeeper, including Bosnia, Kosovo and Liberia.  From this she learned that peacekeeping operations must be tailored to each situation and comprehensive.  It only creates problems to train more police officers without also training judges and corrections personnel.  Holland believes there are advantages to using women peacekeepers.  After she negotiated a ceasefire in Kosovo, one of the protagonists told UN personnel that the effort would not have been successful if it had been led by a man.

William Stuebner of IDS International listed the reasons the U.S. should be more involved in UN peacekeeping operations.  Successful peacekeeping work quarantines conflict, saves money, and depoliticizes responsibility.  Additionally, Stuebner argued that it is just the “right thing to do,” though he acknowledged this argument carries little weight in Washington. 

Deborah Owens, who has served in Somalia, Rwanda, and the Balkans, emphasized that peacekeepers live “close to the ground” getting their hair cut at local salons, visiting local restaurants, and staying in normal apartments, which allows them to understand the local issues in a more nuanced way.  Finally, peacekeeping missions have established a presence in conflict zones that would be hard for other countries to enter without inciting violence.

As for what the U.S. could do to help more, Stuebner pointed to training, assisting with transportation, intelligence and special troops.  The U.S. should also continue to pay its assessed dues.  It is a misconception in the U.S. that we contribute a significant number of peacekeepers when in reality, on the list of countries that contribute the most blue berets (UN peacekeepers) we were number 58 as of August.

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

America’s Iran options aren’t great

Unless Iran agrees to unprecedented constraints, or Washington drops its broad portfolio of demands, we…

2 days ago

The Board of Peace is another Trump scam

The Board of Peace is another Donald Trump scam intended to empower himself. The sooner…

5 days ago

The Trump through line is unrestrained power

Trump should understand that the quickest way to end the Ukraine war is to tighten…

5 days ago

The domestic cures for Trumpmania

This move wouldn't necessarily save Greenland, Venezuela, or Iran, but it would slow Trump's perfidies…

2 weeks ago

Stop him before it is too late

Trump is hurting American security in the Arctic. He wouldn't know a threat to national…

2 weeks ago

Color me skeptical but surprise me, please

A one-state outcome with unequal rights will prevail. Frustration will increase and boil over, tragically…

3 weeks ago