Yes, Syria can get worse

The Syrian Coalition of Revolutionary and Opposition Forces (Etilaf) decided yesterday that it would go to a Geneva 2 diplomatic conference:

The G[eneral] A[ssembly] [of Etilaf] endorsed the Syrian Coalition’s readiness to participate in a Geneva conference based on the transfer of power to a transitional governing body (TGB). This body should include full executive powers including presidential powers with control over military and security apparatus.  Furthermore, the Assad Regime and those associated with him will have no role in the transitional period and future Syria.

The Syrian Coalition stipulates that prior to the conference access for relief convoys, including the Red Cross and the Red Crescent IFRC and other international relief agencies, to all besieged areas must be ensured, and prisoners, especially women and children, must be released.

What this “based on” language does is to make Bashar al Asad’s removal from power not a precondition for talks as in the past but instead Etilaf‘s desired outcome in the future.  Humanitarian access and release of prisoners are standard demands in situations such as this.  Likely the Syrian regime will be prepared to offer half a loaf:  a few humanitarian convoys and release of some women and children.

There really wasn’t much choice.  Washington has been insisting that the Coalition agree to Geneva 2, posing the question as a choice between dealing either with Al Qaeda or with the regime.  A refusal to go to Geneva 2 would have led to withdrawal of Western support.  Perhaps even the Saudis were convinced to condition their assistance on a start to negotiations.

The truth is that the relatively moderate opposition will need to deal with both Al Qaeda and the regime, one way or the other.

Etilaf is not strong enough to do it with military force. Today’s news includes a regime offensive to retake Aleppo’s airport.  Iranian and Russian military assistance to the regime is flowing unrestrained.  Al Qaeda in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has become dominant in Raqqa, the one provincial capital in opposition hands and is strengthening across the north.  The Supreme Military Council, the military affiliate of Etilaf and nominal coordinator  of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) brigades, is less and less in evidence.

There is no sign it is strong enough to counter the regime and ISIS with politics either.  Wisely, Etilaf is sending people into Syria to talk with opposition supporters in advance of Geneva 2.  They will get an earful.  Opposition activists are disappointed with Etilaf, which has been unable to deliver governance and services to liberated areas.  Many people inside Syria lean more towards negotiating with the regime, as they hope it will end the military’s campaign against the population.  But they have little trust in the mostly expatriate Etilaf to do it.

Etilaf, broadened with some representation of the FSA and opposition activists from inside Syria, may have no choice but to go to Geneva 2.  But talks are unlikely to produce a political settlement any time soon.  The regime sees no reason to allow itself to be decapitated.  It will want Etilaf to agree to participate in the 2014 presidential elections, with Bashar al Asad as a candidate.  Doing so would be fatal to the moderate opposition and leave Syria’s fate to a battle between extreme Islamists and the regime.

That is likely in any event.  Power today in Syria grows from the barrel of a gun, supplemented by humanitarian assistance.  Extremists are proving better at both than Etilaf, which has the additional disadvantage of fickle Western friends.  As Syrians see it, the Americans not only backed off bombing of Syria’s chemical weapons facilities but are also now cozying up to Iran in an effort to reach a nuclear deal.

Whom would you back?  You have a choice:

  • the guys with long beards inside Syria capable of protecting you against the regime and feeding you, even if their methods are brutal and their religious practices oppressive, or
  • the closer-shaven ones who meet outside the country, command no army and can’t even convince the internationals to bring their humanitarian assistance in from Turkey and Jordan.

Geneva 2 is unlikely to produce a political settlement.  But even if it does, the war will not end because the negotiators there won’t command the extremist fighters.  Those who think things can’t get worse in Syria are in for a surprise.

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

De-escalation is the way to go

President Trump is stuck in a war he should never have even thought about starting.…

18 hours ago

Getting rid of what works, and what doesn’t

The regime was arguably on its last legs when the Israelis and Americans attacked. It…

7 days ago

Intersections, not convergence

The best way to generate international norms for technology is in what we call in…

1 week ago

Statehood and language

Albanian as an official language is a right, a reflection of the state’s multiethnic character,…

2 weeks ago

Iran lost militarily but won strategically

The war is ending with the strait of Hormuz in Iranian control. The US and…

2 weeks ago

Trump is desperate, the Iranians are winning

Trump is now desperate to end the war before it causes more damage to the…

2 weeks ago