Reuters published this piece this morning:
On Saturday the United Nations Security Council demanded that Syria’s government and its armed opponents end attacks on civilians, allow the delivery of humanitarian aid across borders and battle lines, and protect minorities. The Security Council also called for the lifting of sieges against civilians and said that it would take additional measures if the two parties did not comply.
Even if fully implemented, this welcome push on humanitarian issues will not end the violence in Syria, or resolve a conflict that has left over 120,000 people dead and one-third of the population displaced. More action is needed if a political solution is to be found and a serious peace process initiated. The American people won’t support deployment of U.S. troops. Russia will veto any new U.N. Security Council resolution with teeth. But Washington should consider other diplomatic, assistance, financial and military options.
To read more, you’ll have to go to Reuters.
Those of us looking for a Ukrainian military victory, a Palestinian state that will live…
The sad fact is that non-member Kosovo today is more qualified for CoE membership than…
The legal profession could also constitute an international nongovernmental group to advise on conflict issues…
The wider war has arrived, but until there is decisively new leadership in both Tehran…
It really is a good lesson in diplomacy: anticipate trouble, try to prevent it, and…
It is high time for Israeli practice to rise to the level of Jewish ideals.…