Reuters published this piece this morning:
On Saturday the United Nations Security Council demanded that Syria’s government and its armed opponents end attacks on civilians, allow the delivery of humanitarian aid across borders and battle lines, and protect minorities. The Security Council also called for the lifting of sieges against civilians and said that it would take additional measures if the two parties did not comply.
Even if fully implemented, this welcome push on humanitarian issues will not end the violence in Syria, or resolve a conflict that has left over 120,000 people dead and one-third of the population displaced. More action is needed if a political solution is to be found and a serious peace process initiated. The American people won’t support deployment of U.S. troops. Russia will veto any new U.N. Security Council resolution with teeth. But Washington should consider other diplomatic, assistance, financial and military options.
To read more, you’ll have to go to Reuters.
An Administration that favors stability over security, fails to mention democracy and the EU, and…
Accession of Montenegro and Albania would help the EU stake its claim to leadership of…
I am going to repeat that hope that Montenegro will be an EU member in…
Trump touted the Beijing meetings as maybe "the biggest summit ever." That's his usual hyperbole.…
This clip reveals two things about Trump. He has downgraded his goals for the Iran…
The international community, as it used to be called, could be generous. It also makes…