Categories: Bouela Lehbib

Neutrality of sorts

The United States Institute of Peace (USIP) hosted a discussion on March 11 about how Pakistan navigates the Saudi Arabia-Iran rivalry, with Alex Vatanka, Senior Fellow at Middle East Institute. He was joined by Ankit Panda, Senior Editor at The Diplomat and Karen Young, Resident Scholar at American Enterprise Institute.

Panda spoke about the competition of Saudi Arabia and Iran in South Asia, mainly in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Pakistan has historically sought to play a neutral role in the Saudi-Iranian conflict. It remained neutral in the Saudi-led Decisive Storm campaign against the Houthis in Yemen. The 5000 troops Pakistan sent to Saudi Arabia were intended to protect the Kingdom’s borders, not to get involved in Yemen’s war. In a bid to avoid heightened tension between Saudi Arabia and Iran following the Saudi Arabia’s execution of prominent Shia Sheikh, Nimr Al-Nimr, Pakistan tried to mediate between the two countries. While its neutrality has been successful so far, it will not prevent Pakistan, if forced to pick sides, from supporting Saudi Arabia over Iran, which was unhappy with Pakistan joining the Islamic Military Counterterrorism coalition (MCTC) led by Saudi Arabia.

Looking at the relationship from an economic perspective, Young claims that Saudi Mohammed bin Salman (MBS)’s visit to South Asia targeted mainly India and China, not only Pakistan. In Islamabad, he had two goals:

  • to strengthen military relations and build a regional anti-terrorism coalition;
  • to gain access to nuclear technology.

Pakistan exports light weapons to Saudi Arabia and benefits from a Saudi loan of $3 billion for oil and gas supplies. More than two million workers from Pakistan and Bangladesh live in Saudi Arabia. Before his visit to Islamabad, Saudi MBS released 200 Pakistani prisoners.

Vatanka gave an overview of Iran’s perspective on the MBS visit to Pakistan. Pakistan’s neutral position since the eighties between Saudi Arabia and Iran is calculated to avoid fighting with the Arabs against Iran. Islamabad does not criticize what Iran is doing in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen or object to its recruitment of fighters from its population, which is 20% Shia. From the Iranian perspective, MBS’s visit entailed animosity towards Iran. But it produced more noise than substantial results. Unlike Saudi Arabia, Iran can not do much to help Pakistan in terms of arms, money, or foreign policy. Tehran and Islamabad have talked for twenty-five years about their pipeline connection, which is yet to be completed.

Bouela Lehbib

Share
Published by
Bouela Lehbib

Recent Posts

Trump is losing two wars, one is in Iran

This clip reveals two things about Trump. He has downgraded his goals for the Iran…

21 hours ago

International mistakes in Bosnia and Kosovo

The international community, as it used to be called, could be generous. It also makes…

3 days ago

Tolls at the strait of Hormuz?

This is not rocket science. If the Americans want to prevent tolling, they need to…

7 days ago

Stuck in a long war with nowhere to hide

The November election is six months off. In the meanwhile, prices will remain elevated. From…

2 weeks ago

De-escalation is the way to go

President Trump is stuck in a war he should never have even thought about starting.…

3 weeks ago

Getting rid of what works, and what doesn’t

The regime was arguably on its last legs when the Israelis and Americans attacked. It…

4 weeks ago