Categories: Daniel Serwer

Afghanistan after the Americans: it’s either peace or chaos

Hamid Bayati of Iran’s Mehr news agency asked questions yesterday. I responded:

Q: As you know new round of Afghans talks began in Qatar and CNN reported that US intelligence assessments paint an increasingly bleak picture of the Taliban’s quickening advance across Afghanistan and the potential threat it poses to the capital of Kabul, warning the militant group could soon have a stranglehold on much of the country in the wake of the US withdrawal of troops. So how do you predict Afghanistan’s future with this assessments?

A: I don’t predict Afghanistan’s future, which is a fool’s game. But its security forces are having a hard time with Taliban, there is no doubt about that.

Q: Some experts said that the situation in Afghanistan and Taliban quickening advance in Afghanistan is a result of an unwritten agreement between US and Taliban. In other words, if the US gives green light to take control of the country, what do you think about this issue?

A: The U.S. agreed under President Trump to an unconditional withdrawal that President Biden is implementing. That was not intended as a green light to a military takeover by the Taliban, who however are taking advantage of it. Washington wanted them engaged seriously in negotiations, not conflict.

Q: Experts believe the US does not want peace and stability in Afghanistan, because if there is not any tension in Afghanistan there is no need for the presence of US troops in the region, so is it true or not and why?

A: The experts who think this need to think again. The US wants out of Afghanistan, not in. I see no reason Washington would not be happy with peace and stability in Afghanistan.

Q: Russia, China, India, Pakistan, and the US have different interests in Afghanistan, so how is it possible these countries reach a common goal about it and end the conflict in Afghanistan?

A: The interests are different, but not entirely incompatible. All would be well-served by a more stable, unaligned Afghanistan. The question is whether they will allow that to happen. The US will no longer be a big player. The more immediate neighbors (Russia, China, India, and Pakistan) will need to collaborate to create an Afghanistan that threatens none of them and is threatened by none of them. It won’t be easy, but the alternative is chaos.

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

Trump’s imperial ambitions won’t end well

Headlines do not solve problems. But they are all Trump really known how to make.…

4 days ago

What decent people hope for in 2026

Global peace and security are in free fall, while decent people worldwide hope for a…

5 days ago

Serbia is not on the fast track to Europe

The best hope for progress is in EU accession for Montenegro, Albania, and North Macedonia.…

1 week ago

Sanity and decency won’t suffice

In the meanwhile, I hope some people are thinking hard not just about sanity and…

1 month ago

Trump’s fake peace in pieces

The racism, misogyny, economic illiteracy, and disdain for decency will catch up with him sooner…

1 month ago

Stability is the problem in the Balkans

Once Bosnians, Kosovans, and Serbians take responsibility, progress toward EU and NATO membership will be…

1 month ago