Categories: Daniel Serwer

Afghanistan after the Americans: it’s either peace or chaos

Hamid Bayati of Iran’s Mehr news agency asked questions yesterday. I responded:

Q: As you know new round of Afghans talks began in Qatar and CNN reported that US intelligence assessments paint an increasingly bleak picture of the Taliban’s quickening advance across Afghanistan and the potential threat it poses to the capital of Kabul, warning the militant group could soon have a stranglehold on much of the country in the wake of the US withdrawal of troops. So how do you predict Afghanistan’s future with this assessments?

A: I don’t predict Afghanistan’s future, which is a fool’s game. But its security forces are having a hard time with Taliban, there is no doubt about that.

Q: Some experts said that the situation in Afghanistan and Taliban quickening advance in Afghanistan is a result of an unwritten agreement between US and Taliban. In other words, if the US gives green light to take control of the country, what do you think about this issue?

A: The U.S. agreed under President Trump to an unconditional withdrawal that President Biden is implementing. That was not intended as a green light to a military takeover by the Taliban, who however are taking advantage of it. Washington wanted them engaged seriously in negotiations, not conflict.

Q: Experts believe the US does not want peace and stability in Afghanistan, because if there is not any tension in Afghanistan there is no need for the presence of US troops in the region, so is it true or not and why?

A: The experts who think this need to think again. The US wants out of Afghanistan, not in. I see no reason Washington would not be happy with peace and stability in Afghanistan.

Q: Russia, China, India, Pakistan, and the US have different interests in Afghanistan, so how is it possible these countries reach a common goal about it and end the conflict in Afghanistan?

A: The interests are different, but not entirely incompatible. All would be well-served by a more stable, unaligned Afghanistan. The question is whether they will allow that to happen. The US will no longer be a big player. The more immediate neighbors (Russia, China, India, and Pakistan) will need to collaborate to create an Afghanistan that threatens none of them and is threatened by none of them. It won’t be easy, but the alternative is chaos.

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

De-escalation is the way to go

President Trump is stuck in a war he should never have even thought about starting.…

4 hours ago

Getting rid of what works, and what doesn’t

The regime was arguably on its last legs when the Israelis and Americans attacked. It…

6 days ago

Intersections, not convergence

The best way to generate international norms for technology is in what we call in…

1 week ago

Statehood and language

Albanian as an official language is a right, a reflection of the state’s multiethnic character,…

2 weeks ago

Iran lost militarily but won strategically

The war is ending with the strait of Hormuz in Iranian control. The US and…

2 weeks ago

Trump is desperate, the Iranians are winning

Trump is now desperate to end the war before it causes more damage to the…

2 weeks ago