Categories: Daniel Serwer

Afghanistan after the Americans: it’s either peace or chaos

Hamid Bayati of Iran’s Mehr news agency asked questions yesterday. I responded:

Q: As you know new round of Afghans talks began in Qatar and CNN reported that US intelligence assessments paint an increasingly bleak picture of the Taliban’s quickening advance across Afghanistan and the potential threat it poses to the capital of Kabul, warning the militant group could soon have a stranglehold on much of the country in the wake of the US withdrawal of troops. So how do you predict Afghanistan’s future with this assessments?

A: I don’t predict Afghanistan’s future, which is a fool’s game. But its security forces are having a hard time with Taliban, there is no doubt about that.

Q: Some experts said that the situation in Afghanistan and Taliban quickening advance in Afghanistan is a result of an unwritten agreement between US and Taliban. In other words, if the US gives green light to take control of the country, what do you think about this issue?

A: The U.S. agreed under President Trump to an unconditional withdrawal that President Biden is implementing. That was not intended as a green light to a military takeover by the Taliban, who however are taking advantage of it. Washington wanted them engaged seriously in negotiations, not conflict.

Q: Experts believe the US does not want peace and stability in Afghanistan, because if there is not any tension in Afghanistan there is no need for the presence of US troops in the region, so is it true or not and why?

A: The experts who think this need to think again. The US wants out of Afghanistan, not in. I see no reason Washington would not be happy with peace and stability in Afghanistan.

Q: Russia, China, India, Pakistan, and the US have different interests in Afghanistan, so how is it possible these countries reach a common goal about it and end the conflict in Afghanistan?

A: The interests are different, but not entirely incompatible. All would be well-served by a more stable, unaligned Afghanistan. The question is whether they will allow that to happen. The US will no longer be a big player. The more immediate neighbors (Russia, China, India, and Pakistan) will need to collaborate to create an Afghanistan that threatens none of them and is threatened by none of them. It won’t be easy, but the alternative is chaos.

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

Ukraine: the frontline and the future

This promises to be a great event!

7 days ago

Dialogue should not be about the Association

The EU should not insist on the ASM but work on other matters until Serbia…

7 days ago

Two awful messes make an awful world

Putin has good reason to be happy with his "нелега́л" agent in the White House.

7 days ago

Albanian anti-government protests: student revolt and political crisis

For a country seeking European Union membership, this is an important test of democratic resilience…

7 days ago

It’s not just the verdict that is unjust

This is one more lesson in why you shouldn't be too friendly to Washington and…

1 month ago

Kosovo should get on with governing

I hope the votes can somehow be found to make Sejdiu president, not because of…

1 month ago