Categories: Daniel Serwer

No fly won’t fly, despite what you may think

Why can’t NATO do more to help Ukraine? Why not institute a no-fly zone that prevents Russian aircraft from attacking Ukrainians forces and population centers?

Yes it would make a difference

Preventing Russian air attacks and close air support would certainly make a difference. The Russians have not established absolute supremacy in the air, but they are stronger there than the Ukrainians. Moscow still has lots of air power in reserve. Preventing it from coming into the fight could be necessary to preserve the viability of Ukraine’s forces.

But enforcing it would entail unacceptable risks

Enforcement of a no-fly zone requires willingness to force down or shoot down violators. Or to destroy violating aircraft while they are on the ground. That’s where things get dicey. NATO would need to be ready to attack Russian aircraft. Bluffing won’t work. Putin would quickly test whether the Alliance is prepared to put its pilots where its declarations are. He would not worry about getting a few Russian pilots killed.

No doubt NATO could put up rather than shut up, but that would initiate hostilities with Russia. Putin could retaliate against the Alliance in any number of countries: Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, or the Baltics. That would trigger Article 5, NATO’s mutual defense commitment, puttng the Alliance at war with Russia. It is easy to imagine further escalation and even eventually a nuclear attack. President Biden is wise not to want to risk that.

It could happen anyway

An escalation of that sort could happen even without a no-fly zone. I hear tell that NATO AWACS flying in Polish airspace is jamming Russian signals. Putin could take that, too, as reason enough to attack Poland. Arms shipments to Ukraine from NATO countries could be another trigger for widening the war. Supply of effective air defenses might be particularly provocative from the Russian perspective.

That argues for ending this war quickly

The risks of escalation will be there so long as the fighting continues. Ending this war quickly is the best way of eliminating those risks. The Russians so far seem unable to defeat Ukraine, but the Ukrainians aren’t able to defeat Russia either. Negotiation is the way to go, but there is no overlap between what Russia wants and what Ukraine is prepared to give, or between what Ukraine wants and Russia is prepared to give. A no fly zone would have virtues, but it won’t fly. The fighting is likely to continue until one side or the other can claim at least pyrrhic victory.

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

America’s Iran options aren’t great

Unless Iran agrees to unprecedented constraints, or Washington drops its broad portfolio of demands, we…

4 hours ago

The Board of Peace is another Trump scam

The Board of Peace is another Donald Trump scam intended to empower himself. The sooner…

3 days ago

The Trump through line is unrestrained power

Trump should understand that the quickest way to end the Ukraine war is to tighten…

4 days ago

The domestic cures for Trumpmania

This move wouldn't necessarily save Greenland, Venezuela, or Iran, but it would slow Trump's perfidies…

2 weeks ago

Stop him before it is too late

Trump is hurting American security in the Arctic. He wouldn't know a threat to national…

2 weeks ago

Color me skeptical but surprise me, please

A one-state outcome with unequal rights will prevail. Frustration will increase and boil over, tragically…

2 weeks ago