Categories: Daniel Serwer

Mushroom clouds over the Middle East

Former IAEA inspector Pantelis Ikonomou writes:

After Hiroshima and Nagasaki, nuclear deterrence became the strongest parameter in projecting geopolitical power.  Nuclear weapons could eventually be decisive in the Middle East.

Israel and Iran are now in direct confrontation

Safeguarding state security and regional dominance are the fundamental aims of the main protagonists, Israel and Iran. Since spring, they have been confronting each other directly. Two exchanges of missiles have resulted. Further escalation seems irreversible.

Serious questions need serious answers. Where is this dynamic leading? What is next? Is there hope for an end to the escalation after next week’s presidential elections in the US? Is the global superpower willing or even capable of rerouting the war dynamics towards a peaceful direction?

The next American President

Candidate Donald Trump in 2018 withdrew the US unilaterally from the Iran nuclear deal. A few days ago Trump urged Israel to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities. Doing that would force Iran to end its doctrine of strategic patience. Iran would exit the NPT, develop the military dimension of its nuclear program, and construct nuclear warheads. Iranian parliamentarians are already proposing this course of action.

The other candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris, was an important voice in Washington as the current Middle East crisis developed. President Biden has struggled to prevent the escalatory spiral. His effort slowed but not stopped it.

The consequences are dire

Continuation of this situation could force Israel to abandon its doctrine of nuclear opacity. It neither confirms nor denies its nuclear weapons. Prime Minister Meir considered using nuclear weapons during the 1973 Yom Kippur war to respond to Egyptian army advances. Prime Minister Netanyahu could also be forced to consider or threaten their use.

An Iranian decision to pursue nuclear weapons or Israeli confirmation of its nuclear capability would change the situation dramatically. Either or both would challenge the credibility of the Non Proliferation Treaty, the IAEA, and the UN Security Council. Adding Iran to the non-NPT states (India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel) could undermine the global security architecture. Mushroom clouds would loom over the Middle East.



Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

Trump has driven America into a dead end

Trump wants to pull the plug. The Israelis don't. And the Iranians are demanding outcomes…

2 days ago

Trump wants to pull the plug

A year from now, we are likely to be remembering a highly effective military operation…

4 days ago

Ending the Iran war well won’t be easy

The devil is not only in the details, but in a highly uncertain future. This…

6 days ago

Do the Balkans really want EU membership?

When the political window opens for Iceland or Ukraine, I hope the Balkan candidates will…

1 week ago

Lots of things can still go wrong

Even if the war were to end tomorrow, the impact would continue to ripple into…

1 week ago

It’s about regime change, no doubt

The greater powers often excepted themselves from the rules-based order. Now it is in tatters.…

1 week ago