Categories: Daniel Serwer

It doesn’t sound quite right

Israel has established control over Iran’s airspace and is now attacking at will. But it has not yet destroyed either of Iran’s main enrichment sites. Nor has it tried to kill the Supreme Leader, so far we know. That’s the next decision point.

If the aim is nuclear, Fordow is where it’s at

Israel claims it is attacking Iran because of its nuclear program, especially uranium enrichment. The enrichment site at Natanz has suffered above ground damage, including to its power plant. That may have damaged the underground centrifuges. Fordow still shows no attack damage. There the centrifuges are 100 yards underground. There is also a third, newer and deeper enrichment site not yet in operation.

Fordow and the new site are so deep the Israelis can’t reliably destroy them. The the bombs they are capable of delivering are not powerful enough. They might bomb the entrances to block them, or land a ground force to blow them up. Or they can ask the Americans to do it with 5000-bomb behemoth bombs.

President Trump is refusing to comment on possible US involvement in offensive operations against Iran. That is a sign the Americans are at least thinking about helping out. Destroying Fordow and the third site would return Iran to a year from its earlier “threshold” nuclear status. Trump caused this war. He’ll want to be in on it if Israel is going to win.

Or is the Islamic Republic the real target?

Rumint suggests Trump has asked Netanyahu not to kill the Supreme Leader. That gives Trump incentive to help with the enrichment sites.

But it surely displeases Netanyahu. He seems as much interested in regime change as in destroying nuclear sites. Hostility towards the Islamic Republic is a pillar of his career. He won’t want to end this war with it still in place. Just as he doesn’t want the Gaza war to end with Hamas in place. If he can destroy both, he can even hope to win a post-war election.

Israel has killed lots of Iranian military commanders and scientists. Killing Khamenei would up the ante. There is no telling who might take his place, or whether the institutions of the Islamic Republic would survive. Khamenei is bad. A successor could be worse. Or not. No one knows.

Protection or perdition?

The guy who says he is protecting the world doesn’t know either. His thirst for destruction seems insatiable in Gaza. Why would it be less in Iran? He may think he is protecting the world while sending it down the path to perdition. Without a vote, even inside Israel. For the sake of his own career. Doesn’t sound quite right.

PS:

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

It’s not just the verdict that is unjust

This is one more lesson in why you shouldn't be too friendly to Washington and…

2 weeks ago

Kosovo should get on with governing

I hope the votes can somehow be found to make Sejdiu president, not because of…

2 weeks ago

Rehabilitation of Mladic is rehabilitation of Vucic

Miloš Ćirić, a political scientist in Belgrade, writes in Danas, Sept. 12-13, 2026: Serbia buried…

2 weeks ago

The bright spot is visible but not certain

So what's the bright spot? I hope the election. Americans on November 3 have an…

2 weeks ago

The Death of a Convicted War Criminal, Survival of an Ideology

A war criminal can die, while the ideology that made him a hero survives. That…

3 weeks ago

Montenegro, a War Criminal, and European Integration

We are witnessing a new variation on Milan Kundera’s famous *The Joke*: “Optimism is opium…

3 weeks ago