Categories: Daniel Serwer

Bunker buster or not, that’s the question

The Israelis have succeeded in sucking Donald Trump into their war with the Middle East. He is already saying “we” when referring to Israel’s successes in destroying Iran’s air defenses. “We” are also threatening to kill the Supreme Leader.

This talk is inappropriate, and the Israeli war was ill-advised. More diplomacy was in order. But still there is a big question out there.

The predicament

If Iran keeps its deeply buried Fordow enrichment facility, any ceasefire will allow Tehran to rush to build a nuclear weapon. That is not in the US interest, or in the interest of most of the rest of the world.

This has put the US in a predicament. It can refuse to use one of its bunker busters, but that will leave the Israelis with the task. They could try to do it with a special forces air and ground raid. Or they could use their 2000-pound bombs, which experts think can do no better than block the tunnel entrances.

Unless the Israelis can be certain Fordow and any other enrichment facilities are destroyed, they will continue the war. Prime Minister Netanyahu might welcome that, since he wants regime change.

The quicker way to end the war short of regime change is to use two 30,000-pound penetrators (GBU-57 E/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP). Even that is not a sure thing. The US could acted under a thin veil of secrecy, without deploying forces to the region. The B2 bombers that carry the massive bombs could have accomplished the task flying from the United States, or many other places on earth.

What Trump will choose

But that is not Trump. He has already blown the possible (thin) cover of a B2 raid by talking openly about US involvement, threatening the Supreme Leader personally, and moving US naval assets to the Middle East.

He could insist that the Israelis try a special forces operation first. They might be willing provided he promises a B2 attack if it fails. My guess is that he won’t do that. He wants in on Israel’s success. He’ll go for the B2s. He should get a commitment from Israel first that the war will stop if the B2s are successful.

The wiser choice

Ironically, this is the wiser choice, even if for the wrong reasons. Allowing Netanyahu to continue to pummel Iran would be a mistake. That will kill many more Iranians and Israelis than ending the war quickly. Bombing rarely causes a population to turn against a regime. Regime change in Iran is up to the Iranians, not the Israelis. They would do better to focus on regime change in Jerusalem, not Tehran.

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

Trump is losing two wars, one is in Iran

This clip reveals two things about Trump. He has downgraded his goals for the Iran…

22 hours ago

International mistakes in Bosnia and Kosovo

The international community, as it used to be called, could be generous. It also makes…

3 days ago

Tolls at the strait of Hormuz?

This is not rocket science. If the Americans want to prevent tolling, they need to…

7 days ago

Stuck in a long war with nowhere to hide

The November election is six months off. In the meanwhile, prices will remain elevated. From…

2 weeks ago

De-escalation is the way to go

President Trump is stuck in a war he should never have even thought about starting.…

3 weeks ago

Getting rid of what works, and what doesn’t

The regime was arguably on its last legs when the Israelis and Americans attacked. It…

4 weeks ago