Cemented or demented?

The Egyptian Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF) has conducted an autocoup (that’s a coup conducted by people already in power against another part of the governing establishment) in the past few days.  It has taken advantage of the Supreme Constitutional Court’s decision on the parliament to arrogate to itself legislative powers.  It had already asserted arbitrary powers to arrest and detain.

After the polls closed yesterday, it even issued a constitutional declaration giving itself broad powers, no matter who is elected president.  This is as clear an indication as any that Muslim Brotherhood (Freedom and Justice Party) candidate Mohammed Morsi won the presidential election, as his adherents have claimed.

The American press describes the army as “cementing” power.  That’s unquestionably what they are trying to do.  But it is unlikely to work.  No army would find it easy to run a country as big and as complicated as Egypt on its own.  The SCAF will discover quickly that it doesn’t want to deal with food subsidies, marital status laws, female genital mutilation and lots of other things that Egypt’s citizens think important.

It won’t be easy for the SCAF to govern, but it won’t be easy to back out either.  New parliamentary elections could bring the Islamists to power, again.  The backlash might even strengthen their position, which reached 48% of the parliamentary seats in the last polls.  SCAF will find itself in a tug-of-war with Morsi, who will have democratic legitimacy on his side.  Unless the army and the Brotherhood can come to terms, Egypt is in for a tumultuous time.

The role of the army in the Egyptian revolution has been problematic from the first.   It evicted Hosni Mubarak from power.  At every juncture since, the SCAF has sought to preserve its own power and interests, even as the people of Egypt demanded more freedom and control over the country’s destiny.  It would be unrealistic to expect the SCAF to change its behavior any time soon.

So the key question now is how the people of Egypt react.  Will they again take to the streets in overwhelming numbers to demand that the revolution continue?  Or will they prefer the promise of law and order to the risk of chaos?  Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood will have an important role in this difficult choice.  Will they seek, despite the odds against it, a pact with the army, or will they throw their organizational talents into street demonstrations against it, hoping to improve the terms of the bargain or even chase the SCAF from power?

It is yet to be seen whether the military has cemented power, or has deluded itself so thoroughly that its moves will be seen one day as demented.

PS: I can’t imagine anyone will ever find this here, but just in case you are someone who missed it, here is Jon Stewart’s interview with Egyptian heart surgeon/comedian Bassem Youssef:

 

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer
Tags: Egypt

Recent Posts

Ending two wars as best we can

The Ukraine and Iran wars have damage US standing. Rebuilding the US military and diplomacy…

1 week ago

Where we are at with Iran

Negotiation will save lives and money. But the agenda will have to be the terms…

2 weeks ago

More pain and little gain

For now, Donald and Mojtaba seem content to batter each other. Only more pain and…

2 weeks ago

On the agenda and off for US-Serbia

President Vucic is getting a boost. Transactions are on the agenda. Democracy, rule of law,…

3 weeks ago

It’s an old game. They’ll play it again

The US will try to get Serbia aligned with US objectives. Serbia will offer half…

3 weeks ago

How to fix what ails America

If even a handful of retiring Republicans announce that they will caucus with the Democrats,…

4 weeks ago