The antidote to a “huge trend of lying”

There is so much bad news from Syria that it counts as good news when someone undertakes a serious effort to document what is happening.  Mohammed al-Abdullah, a young Syrian living in Washington, is leading an effort to do just that at the Syria Justice and Accountability Centre.  He briefed on the nascent Centre, which will be located in Lyon, France, this morning at Brookings, with Tamara Wittes in the chair.

For now, the data is collected by other organizations, Syrian and international, before being mapped on the SJAC website. Data sources are vetted and documented.  It is the Centre’s intention to document all abuses, regardless of the perpetrators.  Eighteen governments are supporting the initiative, which grew out of a Hillary Clinton commitment to accountability.  There will be a donors conference in Morocco September 14.  IREX, Public International Law and Policy Group and No Peace Without Justice are SJAC partners.

The data will not generally provide the kind of legal basis needed for individual prosecutions.  But it will document what is going on, provide important leads and context, and will be useful in the future for memorialization.

It is also hoped that such documentation may reduce the likelihood of future revenge violence, in particular on a sectarian basis.  I frankly doubt that:  I don’t know of an instance in which documentation efforts have demonstrably reduced the likelihood of revenge, but if readers do I hope they will comment accordingly.  There is no sign yet of Alawite or Druze community openness to this initiative, even though it would be welcomed.

A number of interesting comments were made during the presentation.  One knowledgeable long-time observer of the Levant noted that there has been no documentation of the civil war or any serious reconciliation in Lebanon, but somehow everybody has agreed to forget, if not to forgive.  That admittedly seems unlikely in Syria, where the conflict is taking on an increasingly sectarian character.  It was noted that defectors from the Syrian army are more open to applying international humanitarian law once they join the revolution than civilians who take up arms, some of whom are bent on revenge.

Perhaps most tellingly it was noted that there is a “huge trend of lying” among Syrians, who may exaggerate what is going on, misrepresent their role in it, and even prevaricate about where they are located.  This alone makes the SJAC effort worthwhile.  The numbers are horrifying enough without exaggeration:  more than 22,000 killed and more or less the same number wounded.  And things are getting worse, not better.

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

The Death of a Convicted War Criminal, Survival of an Ideology

A war criminal can die, while the ideology that made him a hero survives. That…

2 days ago

Montenegro, a War Criminal, and European Integration

We are witnessing a new variation on Milan Kundera’s famous *The Joke*: “Optimism is opium…

2 days ago

Time to fish and cut bait in Kosovo

It is high time to get on with the serious business of governing, which includes…

7 days ago

Improve border crossings to help cross invisible boundaries

Belgrade talks the talk, takes the EU money, and does nearly nothing. It is time…

2 weeks ago

Time to withdraw US bases in the Gulf

Allowing the powers that be in the region to reach their own equilibrium, with US…

4 weeks ago

Trump is up the Gulf without a paddle

Trump has promised an agreement with Iran that can't be reached while Iran and Oman…

1 month ago