Day: July 30, 2019

Peace Picks | July 29 – Aug 2

US-China Relations: The View From Cities And States | July 29, 2019 | 9:30 AM – 11:45 AM | Brookings Institution | Falk Auditorium, 1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036 | Register Here

Throughout the United States, local leaders are stepping onto the world stage. Governors and mayors have expanded their international portfolios, including by launching initiatives to attract investment and jointly address transnational challenges like climate change. While economic interests previously guided much of sub-national outreach, cultural exchange and scientific partnership are also becoming important forces of attraction.

The U.S.-China relationship is no exception to this trend. Despite the shift in Washington toward viewing China as a strategic competitor, many state and local leaders continue to explore ways to seize opportunities for closer collaboration with Chinese counterparts. What are the key motivations for this outreach at the sub-national level? Are such efforts generating positive benefits? What effect, if any, are deepening relations between local governments in the United States and China having on the overall bilateral relationship? Are there risks from deepening sub-national U.S.-China relations that deserve greater scrutiny?

On July 29, the John L. Thornton China Center at Brookings will host a public event to explore the costs, benefits, and impacts of sub-national exchanges between the United States and China. Oregon Governor Kate Brown will join a keynote conversation moderated by award-winning journalist and author James Fallows. A high-level panel of experts and practitioners will then convene to discuss the potential promises and pitfalls of sub-national connections within the U.S.-China relationship.

Speakers:

Introduction

  • Cheng Li, Director – John L.  Thornton China Center, Senior Fellow – Foreign Policy

Keynote Conversation

  • The Hon. Kate Brown, Governor – State of Oregon

Moderator:

  • James Fallows, National Correspondent – The Atlantic, Co-Author – “Our Towns: A 100,000-Mile Journey into The Heart of America”

Discussion

  • The Hon. Bob Holden, Former Governor – State of Missouri, Chairman and CEO – United States Heartland China Association
  • Amb. Nina Hachigian, Deputy Mayor of International Affairs – City of Los Angeles
  • Reta Jo Lewis, Senior Fellow and Director of Congressional Affairs – The German Marshall Fund of the United States

Moderator:

  • Ryan Hass, The Michael H. Armacost Chair, Fellow – Foreign Policy, Center for East Asia Policy Studies, John L. Thornton China Center

Development of Environmental Law and Enforcement in China | July 29, 2019 | 11:30 AM – 1:00 PM | Environmental Law Institute, Suite 700 | 1730 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20036 | Register Here

This year marks the 40th anniversary of the establishment of the diplomatic relations between the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China. Over the past decade, the U.S. government, civil society, academia, and businesses have been actively engaging with China on environmental governance through capacity-building, knowledge transfer, and other mechanisms. These efforts have been instrumental in transferring best practices in environmental governance, helping China develop towards an effective and predictable environmental regulatory system, encouraging the growth of a vibrant community of environmental advocates and officials, and moving towards a more level playing field for U.S. businesses.

In recent years, the Chinese government has made efforts to address environmental quality that have included the enactment of new laws on air pollution, water pollution, and contaminated sites, and provisions strengthening enforcement. While PM2.5 levels have declined significantly, much work remains to get air quality protective of public health, and formidable water pollution and soil contamination problems remain. 

Top U.S. government environmental lawyers will join John Pendergrass, Vice President of ELI, and Jennifer Turner, Director of the Woodrow Wilson Center’s China Environment Forum to compare their recent experiences, and to discuss Chinese environmental law developments, new approaches to enforcement, and the effects of Chinese environmental laws on U.S. companies. 

Panelists:

  • Jeffrey Clark, Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD), Department of Justice
  • Matt Leopold, General Counsel, Environmental Protection Agency
  • Jon Brightbill, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD), Department of Justice

Moderator:

  • John Pendergrass, Vice President, Programs and Publications, Environmental Law Institute
  • Jennifer L. Turner, Director, China Environment Forum & Manager, Global Choke Point Initiative

Ukraine’s Parliamentary Elections | July 29, 2019 | 12:30 AM – 2:00 PM |  The Atlantic Council | 1030 15th St NW, 12th Floor, Washington, DC 20005 | Register Here

The July 2019 parliamentary elections are a pivotal event in Ukraine’s history as the people voted to elect a new parliament, which will form a new government. Running with a strong anti-corruption message, then political outsider Volodymyr Zelenskyy won a crushing victory in April’s presidential elections and again in the Rada elections, where exit polls show his party securing around 43 percent of the vote, a historic result and the most decisive of its kind in Ukraine since 1991. With an outright majority in the Rada a possibility, Zelenskyy may now have the mandate he needs to implement his anti-corruption program.

Panelists:

  • Adrian Karatnycky, Senior Fellow & Co-Director of the Ukraine in Europe Initiative, Eurasia Center, Atlantic Council
  • Ambassador John Herbst, Director, Eurasia Center, Atlantic Council
  • Dr. Anders Åslund, Senior Fellow, Eurasia Center, Atlantic Council

Moderator:

  • Melinda Haring, Editor, UkraineAlert, Atlantic Council

Hong Kong and the Indo-Pacific Political Economy with former U.S. Consul GeneralKurt Tong | July 30, 2019 | 4:00 PM – 5:00 PM | CSIS Headquarters, 2nd Floor | 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036 | Register Here

Kurt Tong, former U.S. Consul General to Hong Kong and Macau, has returned to the United States following a three-year tour and has retired from the Foreign Service. He will join us at CSIS to discuss Hong Kong’s relationship with China and comment on the future direction of American economic policy in the region.

Speakers:

Introduction

  • Matthew P. Goodman, Senior Vice President and Simon Chair in Political Economy, CSIS

Keynote Address

  • Amb. Kurt Tong, U.S. Consul General to Hong Kong and Macau

Armchair Discussion

  • Amb. Kurt Tong, U.S. Consul General to Hong Kong and Macau
  • Scott Kennedy, Senior Adviser, Freeman Chair in China Studies and Director, Project on Chinese Business and Political Economy, CSIS

Assessing Space Security: Threat and Response | July 31, 2019 | 2:00 PM – 3:30 PM | Brookings Institution | Falk Auditorium, 1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036 | Register Here

It is a dynamic and fast-moving time with regard to the security of the outer space environment. In March 2018, India conducted a successful anti-satellite test. Russia and China continue to advance their anti-satellite weapons capabilities by developing various technologies, from laser weapons to ground-based anti-satellite systems. In response to this increasingly contested environment, President Donald Trump proposed the creation of a U.S. Space Force in 2018. The idea was not without controversy. While some experts lauded the decision, others advocated instead for a Space Command. A year in, that debate continues.

On July 31, the Foreign Policy program at Brookings will host a discussion on the evolving threats to space security and how the United States and the international community can most effectively respond to these challenges. Brookings Senior Fellow for Security and Strategy Frank Rose will be joined by an expert panel including Todd Harrison; Mallory Stewart; and Madelyn Creedon. Brookings Senior Fellow Michael O’Hanlon will moderate the discussion as well as share his thoughts on the issues.

Panelists: 

  • Madelyn R. Creedon, Former Principal Deputy Administrator – National Nuclear Security Administration, Nonresident Senior Fellow-the Brookings Institution
  • Todd Harrison, Director, Defense Budget Analysis, Director, Aerospace Security Project and Senior Fellow, International Security Program – CSIS
  • Frank A. Rose, Senior Fellow, Security and Strategy – Foreign Policy
  • Mallory Stewart, Principal Technical Staff – Sandia National Laboratory Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of Arms Control, Verification, and Compliance – U.S. Department of State

Moderator:

  • Michael E. O’Hanlon, Senior Fellow – Foreign Policy, Director of Research – Foreign Policy, The Sydney Stein, Jr. Chair

The New Battle for the Atlantic | July 31, 2019 | 8:30 AM – 10:00 AM |  The Atlantic Council | 1030 15th St NW, 12th Floor, Washington, DC 20005 | Register Here

The North Atlantic has historically played a critical role in the great power conflicts of the 20th Century, serving as a strategic bridge between the United States and Europe during both World Wars and the Cold War. For this reason, sea power has long been a core element of NATO’s deterrence posture. However, as the world enters the ‘maritime century’ – a period transformed by trade and communication across the world’s oceans – emerging technologies and a rapidly changing global political landscape have begun to reshape the maritime security environment in the North Atlantic.

The reemergence of great power competition is forcing NATO to reinvest in capabilities for the maritime domain, where it has historically held a razor thin advantage. Faced with mounting tensions between Russia and the Alliance and an increasingly sophisticated Russian navy, the United States and NATO must rebuild and adapt their strategy and capabilities to secure the strategic link between the United States and Europe in the increasingly contested North Atlantic region.

Magnus Nordenman, a noted expert on NATO and security in Northern Europe and the former director of the Transatlantic Security Initiative at the Atlantic Council, will join us to discuss these important issues, which are also highlighted in his recent book, The New Battle for the Atlantic: Emerging Naval Competition with Russia in the Far North.


Are Sanctions Working? | July 31, 2019 | 9:00 AM – 11:45 AM | CSIS Headquarters, 2nd Floor | 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20036 | Register Here

The CSIS Energy & National Security Program is pleased to invite you to Are Sanctions Working?, a conference examining the state of U.S. sanctions―what is different, what is and is not working, and implications for U.S. foreign policy, the global economy, and the energy sector.

The United States has employed sanctions as a foreign policy mechanism for decades.  In recent years, the United States has developed a new generation of more targeted, more agile economic sanctions.  It has become increasingly reliant on these new tools, and its ambitions for their impact have increased.

Whether more robust sanctions regimes have won any clear victories is a matter of debate.   In the last three years, U.S.-imposed unilateral and secondary sanctions regimes have sought to influence North Korea, Russia, Iran, and Venezuela.  But countries that have been subject to sanctions for years have found ways to adjust to U.S. moves.

This conference will review the efficacy of the new style of U.S. sanctions, understand what is contributing to their success or failure, and gauge their future.  Speakers will also explore how sustained use of sanctions is impacting one universally important sector: the energy sector.

Speakers:

  • John J. Hamre, CSIS President and CEO
  • Sarah Ladislaw, Senior Vice President; Director and Senior Fellow, Energy and National Security Program
  • Heather A. Conley, Senior Vice President for Europe, Eurasia, and The Arctic; and Director Europe Program
  • Matthew P. Goodman, Senior Vice President; Simon Chair in Political Economy and Senior Advisor for Asian Economics
  • Jon B. Alterman, Senior Vice President, Zbigniew Brzezinski Chair in Global Security and Geostrategy, and Director Middle East Program
  • Stephanie Segal, Deputy Director and Senior Fellow, Simon Chair in Political Economy
  • Kevin Book, Senior Associate (Non-resident), Energy and National Security Program
  • Jeffrey Mankoff, Deputy Director and Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program
  • Moises Rendon, Director, The Future of Venezuela Initiative and Fellow, Americas Program
Tags : , , , , , , ,

The real America

I take as proven and irrefutable that President Trump is a racist (call it white nationalist or white supremacist if you prefer), so I won’t offer evidence. It is pointless to argue the case both with his supporters and with his opponents, since the former aren’t interested in evidence and the latter are already convinced. Even National Public Radio, usually shy of controversy, is referring this morning to Trump’s tweets about black politicians as racist. A racist is as a racist says and does.

The question is whether racism is politically advantageous or not. The best numbers I’ve seen on this subject say not. Even among white males, who constitute his core support, Trump is not breaking 50% approval. His overall approval rating has never broken 50%, and in fact he got only 46% of the votes in the 2016 election.

That is possible for a winner because:

  • third party candidates in 2016 arguably deprived Hillary Clinton of some key states;
  • the electoral college, where states have votes equal to their number of representatives plus their number of senators, favors less populous, more rural states that are predominantly Trump supporters.

The United States does not have a one-person, one-vote system for presidential elections. Someone living in Wyoming has about three times of the weight of someone living in California in electing the President. Odds are Trump will get an even smaller percentage of the popular vote in 2020 than he did in 2016, because populous Democratic-leaning states like California and New York will vote overwhelmingly against him, whereas Texas and Florida (both of which went for Trump in 2016) will continue to be fairly close, whoever wins.

If Trump wins without a majority of popular votes in 2020 it will be the third time since 2000 that has happened, with increasingly wide popular vote margins for the Democratic loser. That is a formula for minority, racist rule even before we take into account racist efforts to suppress voting by non-whites. Let’s ignore for the moment the racist drawing of Congressional districts by Republican-dominated state legislatures, which doesn’t directly affect the electoral votes, and the effort to undercount non-whites in the 2020 census, which does.

America is a young country. But it is an old governing system. No other written constitution has been in effect for more than 230 years. The electoral college is a feature of the original. It cannot be changed without a constitutional amendment, which is unthinkable, since the states that gain political weight in the electoral college would not agree to surrender their privilege. Its anti-democratic feature can be defeated by a compact among states to give their electoral votes to the winner of the popular vote. Such a compact is in process of adoption, but it seems unlikely to be in effect by 2020.

So the 2020 election will be an unfair referendum not only on Trump but on racism, as well as the misogyny and xenophobia that accompany it. I’d like to think that the outcome is predictable, even if the playing field is not even. Any American who believes people are born with inalienable rights should have no problem voting against Trump. Anyone who doesn’t believe that–who believes instead that a white skin, male genitalia, or birth to an American parent conveys entitlement beyond that of other citizens–should vote for Trump. The 2020 election will reveal the real America.

Tags :
Tweet